The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) contains approximately 17,000 tariff classification codes. Assigning the correct code to imported merchandise is both an art and a science — and mistakes are extraordinarily common.
HTS misclassification occurs when an imported product is assigned a tariff code that does not accurately describe the merchandise under the legal framework of the HTSUS General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs). The consequences can be severe: duty rates can vary from 0% to 37.5% depending on classification, and Section 301 China tariffs are layered on top for Chinese-origin goods.
1. Classification by commercial description vs. legal description
Many importers (and some brokers) classify goods based on how they're described in commercial catalogs or invoices, rather than by applying the GRIs. This frequently leads to error.
2. Multi-component and composite goods
Products that combine multiple components require careful analysis under GRI 3 to determine the "essential character" of the item. This is a frequent source of disputes.
3. Rapid product evolution
Technology products especially tend to evolve faster than tariff schedules. A product that was correctly classified in 2020 may need reclassification after significant design changes.
4. Over-reliance on broker classification
Customs brokers are not liable for misclassification unless they have reason to know the classification is wrong. Importers remain the responsible party.
Signs that your HTS classifications may be incorrect:
CBP Protests (most common)
For liquidated entries within the 90-day protest window, a formal protest under 19 U.S.C. § 1514 is the primary recovery mechanism. Our attorneys prepare detailed legal memoranda arguing for the correct classification and requesting a refund of overpaid duties.
Post-Summary Corrections (PSCs)
For entries that have not yet been liquidated, PSCs filed through ACE can correct misclassifications before final duty assessment. This is the fastest and least expensive recovery path.
Duty Drawback
If misclassified goods were subsequently exported, drawback may be available on duties already paid — even beyond the protest window.
CIT Litigation
For denied protests involving significant sums or important legal questions, appeal to the Court of International Trade offers another avenue. CIT decisions set binding precedent for future classifications.
Our attorneys conduct the following analysis for each product:
1. Review physical characteristics, composition, and function
2. Apply the six GRIs in sequence
3. Research applicable CBP rulings (searchable at CBP's CROSS database)
4. Review relevant CIT and CAFC decisions
5. Draft a classification memorandum supporting the correct HTS number
6. Calculate the refund potential based on corrected duty rate applied to historical entries
This article is for informational purposes only. Classification determinations are highly fact-specific. Consult a licensed customs attorney for advice regarding your specific products and circumstances.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Tariff classification and customs law are highly fact-specific. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. No tariff recovery is guaranteed. Consult a licensed customs attorney regarding your specific circumstances.
Kerrick T. Wilkins — one of fewer than 8 attorneys with direct Madoff recovery experience — reviews every case personally.
Check Your Eligibility →Or upload documents →CBP Protest Window
90 days from liquidation
CIT Appeal Window
180 days from protest denial
Drawback Filing
5 years from import date
PSC Filing
Before liquidation